A CALIBRATION
STUDY FOR THE COLBERT LANDFILL GROUNDWATER TREATMENT FACILITY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
Douglas G.
Gearhart
Abstract
The purpose of
this study is to maximize contaminant removal using the ten existing extraction
wells at the Colbert Landfill Groundwater Treatment Facility located 15 miles
north northeast of Spokane, Washington. The contaminated area extends from approximately
1 mile north of the Colbert Landfill to about 1.5 miles south of Woolard Road,
and from Hardesty Road, 1 mile east of the Landfill, to the Little Spokane River
about 0.75 miles to the west.
The study area
is situated in an alluvial valley that is surrounded by crystalline basement
rock highlands to the east and west. Granite basement rock underlies the study
area. During the Miocene Epoch basalt flows from the Grande Ronde Formation and
the Priest River Member of the Wanapum Basalt Formation were emplaced in the
study area. Concurrent to the basalt flows, the Latah Formation (sedimentary
lake bed deposits) was deposited as the basalt blocked the flow of rivers and
streams in the area, thus creating lakes and swamps. During the Pleistocene Epoch,
repeated catastrophic floods deposited unconsolidated sands and gravels, as
well as glaciolacustrine clays in the study area. Subsequent landslides have
modified the geology of the study area.
Chlorinated
organic solvents disposed of at the Colbert Landfill, between 1975 and 1980, contaminated
the groundwater. Solvents were reportedly disposed of at an average rate of
several hundred gallons per month, and primarily consisted of 1,1,1-trichloroethane
and methylene chloride. Other organic solvents were detected in the
groundwater, including trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene,
1,1-dichloroethylene, and 1,1-dichloroethane. These chlorinated organic solvents
are referred to as the ÔConstituents of Concern.Õ
The Colbert
Groundwater Treatment Facility consists of ten extraction wells and an air
stripping tower. Five extraction wells are in the lower sand and gravel aquifer,
four extraction wells are in the upper sand and gravel aquifer, and one
extraction well is in a basalt aquifer. Groundwater samples were taken as these
wells were run throughout the full range of pumping rates. This study shows
that only three extraction wells, CP-W2, CP-W3, and CP-E1 need to be operated
at their maximum flow rates, 260 gallons per minute, 260 gallons per minute,
and 155 gallons per minute respectively, to maximize contaminant removal. Five extraction
wells, CP-W1, CP-S1, CP-S4, CP-S5, and CP-S6 can be operated at their minimum
flow rates, 70 gallons per minute, 45 gallons per minute, 15 gallons per
minute, 15 gallons per minute, and 40 gallons per minute respectively, and
still maintain containment and extraction of contaminants. The other two extraction
wells, CP-E2 and CP-E3 can be operated at 50% pumping capacity, 2.0 gallons per
minute and 120 gallons per minute respectively, while maintaining significant
contaminant capture.