RESEARCH within the ANTLER and SONOMA OROGENS

NORTHWESTERN NEVADA

1983-1993

by

LINDA B. McCOLLUM

MICHAEL B. McCOLLUM

GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

CHENEY, WASHINGTON 99004-2439

 

For over a decade, we taught part or all of our spring geology field camp within the deformed rocks of the Antler and Sonoma Orogens, with mapping projects in the Battle and Osgood Mountains in northern Nevada.  We also taught graduate courses on Cordilleran tectonics, which involved field trips viewing critical exposures in the East Range, Edna Mountains, Shoshone and northern Sonoma ranges relating to these orogenies.  Although our original intent was just to provide the students with an opportunity to supplement their book learning with actual on-site observation of the original database used to formulate the tenets of these Paleozoic orogenies, the result was to add new observations which challenged the very core of some of the previously accepted concepts.  Students picked up quickly on the old cold war adage of “trust, but verify” when it came to science, a point missed by too many of our professional colleagues who simply cite the existing literature as if it were gospel.

 

The first geology field camp mapping project in the Antler orogen was restricted to several square miles in the Galena and Iron Canyon drainage system on the west side of Battle Mountain and took place during the spring of 1985 and 1986.  In spring of 1987, we relocated our spring field camp to the Osgood Mountains, and completed mapping there in the spring of 1993.  The Osgood mapping project included the Adam Peak, Dry Hills South, and Eden Valley 1:24,000 scale maps.  In addition, critical areas in the eastern portion of the Antler orogen, including the Bull Run Mountains, Adobe Range, Pinon-Sulfur Springs Range, and Roberts Creek Mountains, were visited.

 

By 1994, shrinking enrollments and departmental budget cuts caused us to discontinue teaching our own field camp, and our graduate program was shelved.  Therefore, the only opportunity to involve students in our field-oriented research would be during the summer between their junior and senior years.  Our research interests became focused on the more elementary aspects of stratigraphic research and we selected a project in the Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary interval (see Cambrian Research).

 

The purpose of this document is to make a single record of our observations, including some of the unpublished database, concerning the nature of the sedimentary rocks within the region of the Antler and Sonoma Orogenic belt.  Many of our observations and interpretations were presented at GSA meetings, so a brief summary exists as a series of published abstracts and an occasional short paper.  We even suggested a different tectonic scenario to account for the emplacement of these orogenic belts (McCollum and McCollum, 1989) and the factual database is presented for the first time in this document.

 

 

BATTLE MOUNTAIN, LANDER COUNTY, NEVADA

 

Both the Antler and Sonoma orogenies are well displayed in this area and the Antler Orogeny takes its name for Antler Peak, Battle Mountain, Nevada.  The area has been mapped at several different scales by USGS geologists, beginning with Ferguson, Roberts, and Mueller (1952) at a scale of 1:125,000; by Roberts (1951, 1964), at 1:62,500; and by Theodore (1991a, b; 1994) and Doebrich (1994, 1995) at 1:24,000.  Within each generation of geologic maps produced by USGS geologists, some age refinements are made, but little reinterpretation of the structure is evident.  The most recent maps still reflect a need to structurally separate formations, as though they are distinct tectonostratigraphic assemblages, despite the total absence of ground support for faulting, the interbedded nature of the contacts, infolding of the formations, and age reassignments which are compatible to a stratigraphic succession of facies.

 

Objective of our Research at Battle Mountain

 

The objective to doing research at Battle Mountain was to 1) resolve the apparent age discrepancy within the Scott Canyon Formation (Lower Cambrian archaeocyathids reported by Roberts, 1964, and Devonian microfossils reported by Jones and others, 1978), 2) attempt to establish an internal stratigraphy within the Scott Canyon Formation and deduce its depositional history, 3) ascertain the nature of the contact between the Scott Canyon and Harmony formations, since the contact had been previously mapped as the Dewitt thrust, a structure justified by the supposed differences in structural history and presumed juxtaposition of formation consisting of facies thought to deposited in widely separated environments, such as the cherts and greenstones in the Valmy and quartzofeldspathic sandstones in the Harmony (a notion already challenged by Suczek, 1981), and 4) see whether the structural history of both formations were shared or distinctly different.

 

In the spring of 1985, our geology field camp began mapping a two-square-mile area between Galena and Iron Canyons at a scale of 1:4,800, on a topographic base map with contour lines at 10-foot intervals, supplied to us by Duvall Corporation, later Battle Mountain Gold Company (Geologic Map).  False color aerial photographs at a scale of approximately 1:24,000 were furnished by the local BLM office.

 

The geology of the area to be mapped consisted of two formations, the Scott Canyon and the Harmony.  Although these two formations are adjacent to one another over the length of the outcrop belt at Battle Mountain, they were believed to have been originally deposited in two different depositional settings and brought together tectonically during the Antler Orogeny.  Therefore, the formational composition, the structural deformation, and the age of these two formations were to play a pivotal role in the early concepts concerning the Antler Orogeny.

 

At the scale of our mapping, most lithologies within the Scott Canyon Formation could be mapped out individually, thus separating cherts, sandstones, mudrock, and volcanic layers.  Tracing out key beds resulted in a much greater appreciation for mid-scale folding, which had previously been ignored in the larger scale mapping.  In addition, it allowed us to establish a stratigraphic sequence within the Scott Canyon that heretofore had not existed.  Structural dislocations were more easily traced and the sense of displacement could be better ascertained.

 

Results of our Research at Battle Mountain

 

Age discrimination within the lower Paleozoic deep water and oceanic rocks has always been difficult, and this is well reflected in the history of geologic mapping within the Battle Mountain area.  The Harmony and Scott Canyon Formations were questionably assigned a Mississippian age on the early geologic maps.  Both formations were reassigned to the Cambrian in Roberts (1964), based on newly discovered shelly faunas recovered during subsequent regional mapping.  Microfossils were subsequently discovered in many of the chert-bearing formations, and Jones et al. (1978) reported Devonian radiolaria from the Scott Canyon Formation.  Fortunately, our mapping area in Galena and Iron Canyons included the type section of the Scott Canyon Formation where Christ Suczek recovered the Devonian microfossils reported by Jones et al. (1978) and most of the Lower Cambrian archaeocyathid localities cited in Roberts (1964).  The interesting point regarding the archaeocyathids reported in Roberts (1964, p. 16) was that the genera appeared to be those found in Russia and Asia, rather than those previously reported from other localities in California and Nevada.  This fauna was ignored in favor of the endemic Upper Cambrian faunas reported from the so-called “Harmony” Formation in the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range, thus assuring that Antler Orogen would be restricted geographically and considered a local orogen (Speed and Sleep, 1982).

 

Results of the detailed geologic mapping were 1) a small fault-bounded block of chert bearing a Devonian microfauna at the mouth of Scott Canyon is interpreted as a down dropped block of Slaven Chert; 2) the more heterolithic portion of the Scott Canyon Formation resembled the Valmy Formation, and this was confirmed by the presence of Middle Ordovician radiolarian and conodont faunas within a prominently bedded chert layer; 3) a stratigraphy existed within the portion of the Scott Canyon Formation (now transferred to the Valmy Formation) which consisted of a massive gray quartzite overlain by a heterogeneous mudstone-chert-greenstone and minor quartz sandstone facies overlain by a mudstone containing Lower Cambrian fossiliferous limestone olistoliths, overlain by the Harmony-Elder Sandstone (this stratigraphic sequence can be traced along the Valmy-Harmony outcrop belt its entire length from the Sonoma Range southward to Hall Creek); 4) the limestone lenses containing the Lower Cambrian archaeocyathids reported by Roberts are interpreted as olistoliths within a mudstone interval that occurs at the presumed top of the Valmy Formation, adjacent to the Harmony Formation, throughout their mutual outcrop length; 5) the contact between the Valmy and the Harmony is clearly depositional and well exposed in our map area; 6) although small-scale folding in the heterolithic and thin-bedded layers of the Valmy Formation are absent in the more massive quartzofeldspathic sandstones of the Harmony, the mid- to large-scale folding has affected both formations, which is particularly well exposed just north of Galena Canyon, where both formations are clearly infolded; 7) there is no evidence that the Dewitt thrust exists in our map area, and no compelling reason that the Valmy and Harmony Formations should be separated structurally; 8) there is no faunal evidence for the age of the Harmony at Battle Mountain or elsewhere, although the Silurian age of the Elder Sandstone is factual; 9) the Late Cambrian-Early Ordovician dates from microfossils reported by Madden-McGuire and others (1991) is widely believed to be based on fraudulent data and should not be cited according to the senior author; 10) the Upper Cambrian shelly faunas reported from strata mapped as Harmony in the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range, as reported in Hotz and Willden (1964), are from olistolithic units within upper Paleozoic formations (McCollum and McCollum, 1991a) and can no longer be considered conclusive evidence of age or of faunal provenance; and 11) the reason the Harmony and Elder Sandstone never co-occur in the same mountain (although both occur with the Valmy Formation) is that they are different names applied to the same unit, lithologically and stratigraphically.

 

The interpretation of our two square miles of detailed mapping, supplemented by numerous field observations, is surprisingly different from those USGS geologists that have mapped hundreds of square miles of this terrane.  Simply put, the lower Paleozoic oceanic sequence is remarkably similar from mountain range to mountain range.  The co-occurrence of the Valmy and Harmony formations at Battle Mountain and the Sonoma Range, plus the Valmy Formation and Elder Sandstone in the Shoshone Range, is solely due to the fact that they were deposited as a stratigraphic package, which was subsequently deformed and displaced as a single, coherent structural terrane.  There is no compelling physical evidence that these formations were deposited under different sedimentologic regimes in widely separated geographic regions, each with their own separate deformational history, and then brought into juxtaposition along one or more decollement thrusts, such as the Roberts Mountain thrust or the Dewitt thrust.  The origin of quartzofeldspathic sands, particularly those deposited in the Silurian Elder-Harmony Formation, and to a lesser degree the quartz sands found in the Ordovician Valmy, has been an area of research for many years.  The belief that this deep water lower Paleozoic oceanic assemblage was obducted from just offshore during the Antler Orogeny is totally without foundation.  The observation that the endemic, shallow water Upper Cambrian trilobite faunas reported from the “Harmony” in the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range are found within olistolithic debris flows in which younger mid-Paleozoic conodonts occur (McCollum and McCollum, 1991a), means that this data can longer be used as an argument to constrain the allochthon.  The presence of a shallow water archaeocyathid fauna in olistolithic limestone boulders in the upper part of the Valmy Formation at Battle Mountain and other nearby ranges suggests a paleogeographic relationship with northwestern Canada, Siberia, and the Far East (Debrenne, Gandin, and Gangloff, 1990), certainly not with archaeocyathid faunas found in autochthonous sequences from the Great Basin.

 

Our student mapping project at Battle Mountain attracted some interest from both government and academic geologists.  Although their visits in the field lasted less than a day and occurred after we had finished our mapping, their insight added greatly to our field experiences.  Therefore, we include a brief chronologic narrative on their field visits and their input on our work.

 

 

OSGOOD MOUNTAIN, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA

 

Again, both the Antler and Sonoma orogenies are well displayed in this area and there were fundamental questions concerning the age and structural relationships of many of the Paleozoic formations.  Much of the Osgood Mountains lie just to the north of the regional 1:125,000 scale mapping of 30 degree sheets mapped by the USGS geologists and published in the early 1950’s.  The geology of the Osgood Mountains 15 minute quadrangle, which also covered much of the Hot Springs Range to the west, was included in the second round of more detailed mapping at a scale of 1:62,500 in the 1950’s (Hotz and Willden, 1964) in conjunction with regional scale mapping of 1:250,000 and mineral resources for each county in Nevada, including Humboldt County (Willden, 1964).  Other adjacent areas were remapped in more detail, including the type area of the Harmony Formation in the Winnemucca 15 minute quadrangle (Gilluly, 1967) and the Edna Mountain region, which included the Golconda Thrust, at a 1:24,000 scale (Erickson and Marsh, 1974a, b; and Marsh and Erickson, 1977, 1978).

 

Objective of our Research at Osgood Mountain

 

The objective to doing research at Osgood Mountain was to ascertain 1) the age and nature of the contact between the “Harmony” Formation and the adjacent upper Paleozoic Formations since this was the only area where a formation previously found only within the Roberts Allochthon was emplaced into a sequence deposited after the presumed lower Mississippian age emplacement of the Roberts Mountain Thrust, 2) the Antler overlap sequence is present in the Osgood Mountains, but deposited on the Cambrian Osgood Mountain Quartzite, a shelfal unit thought to be part of the autochthon and the Antler overlap is shown being overthrusted by the Cambrian Preble Formation, and 3) there was a renewed interest in this mountain by economic geologists employed by mining companies interested in the revival of gold mining along the old Getchell Trend, and many of these companies promised access to their properties and copies of letters refining age assignments and internal mapping of both the surface and subsurface in order to aid us in mapping this range as accurately as possible.  In fact it was a mining geologist (Doug McGibbon) that we meet near the crest of the Osgoods in the fall of 1985 that first brought our attention to the fact that much of the mapping by Hotz and Willden (1964) needed to be redone at a larger scale.

 

Our spring geology field course began mapping the Osgood Mountains along the west side in the Goughs and Anderson canyons in May, 1986 and concluded with our last field camp in May, 1993.  Mapping was done directly on false color aerial photographs at a scale of approximately 1:24,000, furnished by the local BLM office, and then transferred to the recently published topographic maps at the same scale.  Mapping was also done by the authors during the summer months, sometimes with student field assistants until 1994.  The intent was to have the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology publish our geology on the three topographic maps, Adam Peak, Dry Hills South, and Eden Valley quadrangles, at the end of the project.  Unfortunately, some of the earlier mapped areas need to be gone over so as to include a graphic representation of infolded lithologies on a formational scale so as to visually relay the message that the upper Paleozoic section is not disrupted by thrusting.

 

Results of our Research in the Osgood Mountains

 

Some of the results of our detailed geologic mapping in the Osgood Mountains were already noted in McCollum and McCollum, (1989a,b; 1990, 1991a,b) and include 1) the recognition of that a through going fault (Osgood Mountain suture) separated the parautochthonous lower Paleozoic outer shelf rocks, which were unconformably overlain by the upper Paleozoic Antler overlap sequence, from the upper Paleozoic continental margin to slope oceanic rocks, 2) that the upper Paleozoic section consists of four mappable formations (Farrel Canyon, Goughs Canyon, “Harmony”, and Adam Peak) ranging in age from early Mississippian to the early Permian, 3) that this upper Paleozoic formational sequence was infolded, but not separated by several thrusts as depicted by Hotz and Willden (1964), 4) that the Upper Cambrian faunas were recovered from megabreccia blocks and smaller olistoliths within the “Harmony” Formation had microfaunas as young Pennsylvanian in age, and that large blocks (some were of typical Harmony facies, others were from the Battle and Etchert Formations) derived and shed basinward from the Antler orogenic highland (including material from both below and from the Antler overlap facies), 5) that the Ordovician rocks exposed along the east side of the mountain range seem to grade northward from a shale facies typical of the Comus Formation into the shale, chert and volcanic facies typical of the Valmy Formation, 6) that the limestone boulders containing early Ordovician trilobites occur as olistoliths in a mudstone facies adjacent to the greenstones mapped as Valmy Formation by Hotz and Willden (1964, p. 23), and 7) our mapping confirmed the fact that in the region including the Osgood Mountains, Hot Springs Range, and Edna Mountains, the lower Paleozoic of both the allochthon and the autochthon share a similar to identical structural history and both are unconformably overlain by the Antler overlap sequence.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

We have had the great good fortune to have our geologic mapping at Battle Mountain and in the Osgood Mountains critiqued in the field and then put into a regional perspective by several key players who contributed directly to establishing the major tenets of the Paleozoic orogenies in the western US.  Most of the interest came as a result of a poster secession (McCollum, Buchanan, and McCollum, 1985) in which we presented our mapping of the Galena Canyon area at Battle Mountain showing that the Lower Cambrian faunas used to date the Scott Canyon Formation by Roberts (1964) occurred as limestone olistoliths in a mudstone found above the highest chert layer and just below the depositional contact with the overlying Harmony Formation.  Although it was not mentioned it in our abstract, we were thinking that, based on our observations that the Devonian Scott Canyon Formation was in conformable contact with the younger Harmony Formation, that the Harmony must be the lateral and time equivalent of the Mississippian(?) Inskip Formation as mapped in the East Range.

 

In late spring, 1986, Walt Snyder visited us at camp in Galena Canyon and spotted microfossils (which turned out to be an Ordovician radiolarian and conodont assemblage) in a regionally extensive chert bed just below the olistostromal unit (containing the Lower Cambrian archaeocyathids) found in depositional contact with the Harmony Formation.  This find was to profoundly change our ideas concerning the age of the Scott Canyon Formation, since there were only two mappable cherts in this area.  We had written Chris Suczek in 1985 to send us a locality map of where she had recovered the Devonian microfossils reported by Jones and others (1978) as coming from the Scott Canyon.  Her locality map showed that all of her samples can from a chert dominated facies within a relatively small area just at the mouth of Scott Canyon on the north side of Galena Canyon.  We had previously mapped this Devonian chert unit as being fault bounded on all sides by high angle normal faults that had extensive brecciation and mineralization (several pits and adits were dug along these fault zones).  We were beginning to suspect that the Devonian cherts were a down dropped segment of the Slaven Chert found to the east in the northern Shoshone Range and that the rest of the Scott Canyon Formation, consisting of massive gray quartzite, mudrocks, chert and volcanics should be reassigned to the Valmy Formation.

 

On July 1, 1986, we spent the day with Ralph Roberts, viewing critical contacts in the lower Paleozoic rocks near the mouth of Galena Canyon that proved that his “Scott Canyon” (now Valmy based on Ordovician microfossils and Slaven based on Devonian microfossils) Formation was both interbedded and infolded with the Harmony Formation (and by inference, the Harmony probably correlates to the Silurian Elder Sandstone).  Dr. Roberts expressed his surprise that these relationships we were pointing out had escaped notice since so many geologists had visited this area over the several decades since he finished his mapping.  He gave us a brief review of the early geologic mapping in this area which gave us a much needed prospective on the formulation of ideas regarding the Antler Orogen.

 

On September 13, 1986, Keith Ketner joined us for the same tour of this critical section.  Keith was also an important player as he and the late Fred Smith had determined the age of the emplacement of the Roberts Mountain Thrust as early Mississippian.  He later came to challenge that age and revisited many of the sites used to determine the age of thrusting within the Antler Orogen.

 

On June 12, 1987, we came across Elizabeth Jones, a grad student of Davy Jones, looking at chert beds in the Farrel Canyon Formation along the western slopes of the Osgood Mountains.  Liz informed us that she wished to do her own thing and didn’t want our input despite our having just completed mapping in the Adam Peak quadrangle.  About two weeks later were met up with Davy Jones and he assured us that Liz was only interested in studying the microfossils in the Paleozoic cherts and he thought what kind of information would be very useful in our stratigraphic and structural interpretations that were to accompany our geologic mapping.  Neither of them ever consulted with us, or even acknowledged our work, as they proceeded on their own, so we finally withdrew from this region in 1993 until they had finished up.

 

On June 25, 1987, we recollected both Ordovician and Devonian chert samples with David Jones.  Dr. Jones thought we should present the new faunal data along with our conclusions that the Scott Canyon Formation was actually a structural amalgamation of the Ordovician Valmy and the Silurian Slaven Chert.  The reassessment of both the ages and formational assignments were presented that October at the national GSA in Phoenix (McCollum, McCollum, Jones, and Repetski, 1987).

 

During May of 1989, we walked the length of the olistostromal facies containing the Lower Cambrian limestone olistoliths with Roland Gangloff, who collected additional archaeocyathid material.  Dr. Gangloff, a leading expert on the archaeocyathida, also concluded that the fauna found here at Battle Mountain was atypical of the Great Basin archaeocyathids he had described in his dissertation in 1975.  He was so impressed with our stratigraphic column that he had it reproduced as figure 2 in Debrenne, Gandin and Gangloff (1990) on their redescription of the archaeocyathid collections first reported by Roberts (1964).

 

In early July, 1989, we returned to Battle Mountain and spent a day with Stan Finney, searching unsuccessfully for any sign of graptolitic facies in the Valmy portion of the Scott Canyon Formation.  Dr. Finney noted that he didn’t have any luck finding graptolites in any of the sites in the Valmy Formation listed by Roberts (1964) on the other side of Antler Peak, noting that the typical dark shale facies are just not present in this region.  We went on to spend a few days with Stan in the Roberts Creek Mountains going over some of the structural and stratigraphic areas he had been working on.

 

In April, 1992 (at the end of the GSA meeting in Ogden, Utah) Mike McCollum and A.R. “Pete” Palmer spent a week looking a Cambrian exposures in the northern Great Basin including several important sites where Pete had previously identified Cambrian trilobites in the Antler Orogen.  Upon viewing the Upper Cambrian localities in both the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range cited in Hotz and Willden (1964), Pete soon became convinced that the megabreccia limestones containing the Upper Cambrian faunas were olistoliths and he likened them to the Cowhead Breccia in Newfoundland, Canada.  As editor of the DNAG series, Pete had a note added at the proof stage of a chapter he had co-authored calling attention to our work in the Osgood Mountains (McCollum and McCollum, 1991a), regarding the age change from Upper Cambrian to Pennsylvanian of the “Harmony” Formation (see Poole and others, 1992, v. G-3. p. 55).

 

What most puzzled Pete was that the sedimentary nature of these redeposited fossiliferous limestone blocks had not been recognized before, particularly as these rocks had been focus of several subsequent studies including an influential paper on the Late Cambrian continental margin in Nevada by Rowell, Rees, and Suczek (1979).  In fact, back in June, 1982, we spent several days looking at Cambrian sections with Burt and Peggy including the Shwin Formation in the Shoshone Range and the Harmony Formation in the Hot Springs Range.  The agnostid fauna in the shales of the Shwin Formation were not redeposited and it was difficult to tell what the context of the platy fossiliferous limestone float in the Harmony was at the main collecting site we visited.  In all fairness, Chris Suczek (1977) realized that some of the Upper Cambrian boulders were probably olistoliths, but found nothing to suggest the real age of the Harmony Formation in her study area was younger (personal communication at the Spokane GSA, May, 1989).

 

We returned to Battle Mountain one last time together in late May, 1993 and meet with Phil Signor to take several days comparing the archaeocyathid localities in both the oceanic Antler orogen and shelfal sections.  We next traveled to an archaeocyathid site in the Valmy Formation just north of Hall Creek in the Toiyabe Range and found several very large olistoliths near the top of the Valmy Formation containing archaeocyathid faunas similar to those at Battle Mountain.  We continued to travel south and visited the Cambrian section in the Mount Callaghan window and the Ravenswood archaeocyathid locality just to the west.  Phil later had a student do a Masters Thesis on the Hall Creek faunas (Dorritie, 1998), comparing this archaeocyathid assemblage in a regional context.

 

On June 28, 1993, Linda McCollum and her graduate student Julie Eddy showed Jeff Doebrich and Ted Theodore some of the more important aspects, including the olistostromal unit just below the Harmony Formation at Galena Canyon, and gave them a copy of our geologic map.  So impressive were the exposures there that they later included this as Stop 5 of a field trip road log to the Battle Mountain Mining District (Doebrich and others, 1996).  Jeff later incorporated our large-scale mapping onto his 1:24,000 scale mapping of the Galena Canyon quadrangle by Doebrich (1994), but he did not abandon the notion that the Scott Canyon Formation was a valid unit of Devonian age, claiming that the Ordovician age reported by McCollum and others (1987) was possibly from a tectonically imbricated and downfaulted block of Valmy Formation.  Jeff also kept the Dewitt Thrust at the base of the Harmony Formation, thus rejecting any idea that the sedimentary contact between the Harmony Formation and the adjacent Valmy or Scott Canyon Formation, that we showed numerous geologists over the years (including Ralph Roberts), exists.  We have never understood the loyalty over honesty policy practiced by some USGS geologists, but Jack Stewart made it clear to us many years ago that it does exist and those that ignore this policy of supporting previous conclusions (Jack cited Keith Ketner as a prime example) do the institution a great disservice.  Despite this, Stewart (1991, p. 24-25) and Theodore (2000) did present the litany of views concerning both the age and structural context of the Harmony Formation.

 

 

ANTLER OROGENY

 

The Antler Orogeny was named by Ralph J. Roberts in 1949 (Roberts, 2002) from exposures at Antler Peak, Battle Mountain, Nevada and the tenets are largely a construct of USGS geologists mapping in central Nevada.  The first regional summary of the Antler Orogen appeared almost a decade later (Roberts and others, 1958).  Two decades later, a Penrose Conference on the Antler Orogeny during September 9-14, 1979, in Elko, Nevada, which included field trips and was attended by many of the leading government, academic, and industry geologists working in the west, formulated a consensus on the definition and extent of the Antler orogen and possible tectonic models to account for it (Nilsen and Stewart, 1980).  Almost a decade later, in 1989, we instigated and chaired a GSA symposium entitled “Upper Paleozoic Orogenies of Western North America”, and hardly a year goes by that some aspect of these Paleozoic orogenic events are presented at one or more of the GSA meeting.  Both the Antler and Sonoma orogenies have found themselves in regional geology and structural textbooks, but seldom is there any sense of controversy over the database (compiled mostly by USGS geologists), although there is some acknowledgement of uncertainty over the correct tectonic setting (academics have done most of the modeling).

 

The Antler Orogenic belt consists of a structural complex of lower Paleozoic continental-margin, slope and rise sedimentary and volcanic rocks which were transported, deformed, uplifted, eroded, and overlapped by upper Paleozoic orogenic shed and shallow water carbonates and clastics.  The Sonoma orogenic belt is a later event, very similar in style and composition, but smaller in geographic extent.  There is evidence of complex structural imbrication within some of the oceanic sequences locally, which can be dated as having formed prior to the deposition of the overlap assemblage.  Certainly, the eastern portion of the Antler belt was emplaced during the late Devonian and uplifted early in the Mississippian, forming a deep depression along the contact zone which filled with orogenic debris. However, there is absolutely no direct and irrefutable evidence as to the mode of emplacement of these oceanic belts within the continental crust, since the Roberts and Golconda thrusts are Mesozoic (most likely Jurassic) features everywhere they can be accurately dated (Ketner and Smith, 1982; Stahl, 1989; Ketner, 1998; Ketner and others, 2000; Dunston and others, 2001).  Keith B. Ketner (USGS) has spent much of his professional life mapping areas critical for dating the age of the Roberts and Golconda thrusts, but his work is seldom, if ever cited.

 

Almost all previous models of the Antler Orogen have considered the Roberts thrust to be the key essential element in ascertaining that the tectonic setting must be within a compressional regime which resulted in the emplacement of lower Paleozoic oceanic rocks over lower Paleozoic shelfal rocks (Nilsen and Stewart, 1980) and that this emplacement occurred during the Late Devonian and Early Mississippian (Johnson and Pendergast, 1981).  These models were always set within an arc setting, differing in whether the arc was obducted, subducted or relatively unaffected, during the Antler orogeny (Moores, 1970; Speed and Sleep, 1982; Burchfiel and Royden, 1991).  But would these models apply if the emplacement of the Roberts allochthon over the shelfal facies took place in the mid-Mesozoic?  Was it time for a very different view of the Antler Orogeny in terms of its tectonic setting?  We thought so and took a shot.

 

We (McCollum and McCollum, 1989a) presented a paper suggesting that the Antler Orogen was a far traveled (from at least as far away as northwestern Canada based on the distinct archaeocyathan assemblages found in the Valmy Formation) terrane that tectonically emplaced oceanic and continental terranes against one another within a transcurrent fault system operating within a transpressional orogen, noting that only in the Jurassic did upper portions of these oceanic terranes get displaced laterally over the shelfal rocks along the Roberts Mountain and related thrusts.  In order to reach a large and interested audience, we scheduled our talk after the afternoon coffee break and sandwiched it between two other husband and wife teams speaking on the Antler Orogeny in our GSA symposium on the “Upper Paleozoic orogenies of western North America” which we chaired.  The room was filled to capacity for the Burchfiel and Royden talk, emptied (almost everyone stepped outside the room and engaged in pleasant conversation in the hallway during our talk) and then the capacity crowd returned to hear the Silberling and Nichols talk. Despite our strategy of scheduling our talk into an excellent time slot and thereby reaching a relatively captive audience, we didn’t anticipate that virtually no one was even interested in listening to our ideas for a short 10 minutes.  Ironically, it was Ralph Roberts that told us just a few years before this (during our only encounter with him), that he thought the time for a totally new interpretation of the Antler Orogeny was not right and we should wait until after the old guard had retired if we wished for a kind reception.

 

 

REFERENCES CITED

 

Burchfiel, B.C., and Royden, L.H., 1991, Antler orogeny: A Mediterranean-type orogeny.  Geology, v. 19, p. 66-69.

 

Debrenne, F., Gandin, A., and Gangloff, R.A., 1990, Analyse sedimentologique et paleontologie de calcaires organogenes du Cambrien inferieur de Battle Mountain (Nevada, U.S.A.).  Annales de Paleontologie (Vert.-Invert.), v. 76, fasc. 2, p. 73-119.

 

Doebrich, J.L., 1994, Preliminary geologic map of the Galena Canyon quadrangle, Lander County, Nevada.  USGS open-file report 94-664.

 

Doebrich, J. L., 1995, Geology and mineral deposits of the Antler Peak 7.5-minute quadrangle, Lander County, Nevada.  Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Bulletin 109, 44 p.

 

Doebrich, J.L., Wotruba, P.R., Theodore, T.G., McGibbon, D.H., and Felder, R.P., 1996, Roadlog for trip H – Geology and ore deposits of the Battle Mountain Mining District, in Green, S.M. and Struhsacker, E., eds., Geology and Ore Deposits of the American Cordillera, Field Trip Guidebook Compendium, p. 330-376.

 

Dorritie, D., 1998, The Hall Creek, Nevada, Archaeocyaths and their paleobiogeographic significance.  M.S. thesis, University of California, Davis, 107 p.

 

Dunston, J.F., Northrup, C.J., Snyder, W.S., 2001, Post-latest Triassic thrust emplacement of the Golconda Allochthon, Sonoma Range, Nevada.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 33, no. 6, p. 327.

 

Erickson, R.L., and Marsh, S.P., 1974a, Geologic map of the Golconda quadrangle, Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-1174.

 

Erickson, R.L., and Marsh, S.P., 1974b, Geologic map of the Iron Point quadrangle, Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-1175.

 

Ferguson, H.G., Muller, S.W., and Roberts, R.J., 1951, Geology of the Winnemucca quadrangle, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-11.

 

Ferguson, H.G., Roberts, R.J., and Muller, S.W., 1952, Geology of the Golconda quadrangle, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-15.

 

Gilluly, J., 1967, Geologic map of the Winnemucca quadrangle, Pershing and Humboldt Counties, Nevada.  USGS Map GQ-656.

 

Gilluly, J., and Gates, O., 1965, Tectonic and igneous geology of the northern Shoshone Range Nevada.  USGS Professional Paper 465, 153 p.

 

Hotz, P.E., and Willden, R., 1964, Geology and mineral deposits of the Osgood Mountains quadrangle Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS Professional Paper 431, 128 p.

 

Johnson, J.G., and Pendergast, A., 1981, Timing and mode of emplacement of the Roberts Mountains allochthon, Antler orogeny.  GSA Bulletin, pt. 1, v. 92, p. 648-658.

 

Jones, D.L., Wrucke, C.T., Holdsworth, B., and Suczek, C.A., 1978, Revised ages of cherts in the Roberts Mountains allochthon, northern Nevada.  GSA Abstracts with Programs, v. 10, no. 3, p. 111.

 

Ketner, K.B., 1984, Recent studies indicate that major structures in northeastern Nevada and the Golconda thrust in north-central Nevada are of Jurassic or Cretaceous age.  Geology, v. 12, p. 483-486.

 

Ketner, K.B., 1998, The nature and timing of tectonism in the western facies terrane of Nevada and California-an outline of evidence and interpretations derived from geologic maps of key areas.  USGS Professional Paper 1592, 19 p.

 

Ketner, K.B., and Smith, J. F., Jr., 1982, Mid-Paleozoic age of the Roberts thrust unsettled by new data from northern Nevada.  Geology, v. 10, p. 298-303.

 

Ketner, K.B., Wardlaw, B.R., Harris, A.G., and Repetski, J.E., 2000, The East Range, northwester Nevada: A neglected key to the tectonic history of the region.  In Cluer, J.K. and others (eds.), Geology and ore deposits 2000: The Great Basin and Beyond – symposium proceedings.  Geological Society of Nevada, p.389-396.

 

Madden-McGuire, D., Hutter, T.J., and Suczek, C.A., 1991, Late Cambrian-Early Ordovician microfossils from the allochthonous Harmony Formation at its type locality, northern Sonoma Range, Humboldt County, Nevada.  GSA Abstracts with Programs, v. 23, no. 2, p. 75.

 

Marsh, S.P., and Erickson, R.L., 1977, Geologic map of the Brooks Spring quadrangle, Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-1366.

 

Marsh, S.P., and Erickson, R.L., 1978, Geologic map of the Goldrun Creek quadrangle, Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS Geological Quadrangle Map GQ-1407.

 

McCollum, L.B., Buchanan, J.P., and McCollum, M.B., 1985, Devono-Mississippian sedimentary environments at the type Antler orogen at Battle Mountain, Nevada.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 17, no. 7, p. 657.

 

McCollum, L.B., McCollum, M.B., Jones, D.L., and Repetski, J., 1987, The Scott Canyon Formation, Battle Mountain, Nevada:  A structural amalgamation of the Ordovician Valmy Formation and Devonian Slaven Chert.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 19, no. 7, p. 764.

 

McCollum, L.B., and McCollum, M.B., 1989a, The Antler orogeny:  A transpressional orogen within a transcurrent fault system.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 21, no. 5, p. 114.

 

McCollum, L.B., and McCollum, M.B., 1989b, Carboniferous continental slope to ocean basin deposits adjacent to the Antler orogenic belt of western North America.  XI Congress International de Stratigraphie et de Geologie du Carbonifere Beijing 1987, Compte Rendu 4, p. 237-244.

 

McCollum, L.B., and McCollum, M.B., 1990, Geologic history of the Osgood Mountains, Nevada.  Great Basin Symposium, Program with abstracts, p. 69.

 

McCollum, L.B., and McCollum, M.B., 1991a, Paleozoic rocks of the Osgood Mountains, Nevada.  In Raines, G. L., Lisle, R. E., Schafer, R. W., and Wilkinson, W. H., eds., Geology and ore deposits of the Great Basin, symposium proceedings.  Geological Society of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, p. 735-738.

 

McCollum, L.B., and McCollum, M.B., 1991b, The Adam Peak allochthon:  A composite terrane in the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range, Nevada.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 23, no. 5, p. A130.

 

Moores, E., 1970, Ultramafics and orogeny, with models of the U.S. Cordillera and the Tethys.  Nature, v. 228, p. 837-842.

 

Nilsen, T.H., and Stewart, J.H., conveners, 1980, The Antler orogeny—Mid-Paleozoic tectonism in western North America.  Geology, v. 8, p. 298-302.

 

Poole, F.G., Stewart, J.H., Palmer, A.R., and others, 1992, Latest Precambrian to latest Devonian time; Development of a continental margin, in Burchfiel, B.C., Lipman, P.W., and Zobach, M.L., eds., The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous U.S. Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, Vol. G-3, p. 9-56.

 

Roberts, R.J., 1949, Structure and stratigraphy of the Antler Peak quadrangle, north-central Nevada.  Geological Society of America Bulletin Abstract, v.60, p. 1917.

 

Roberts, R.J., 1951, Geology of the Antler Peak quadrangle, Nevada.  USGS Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-10.

 

Roberts, R.J., 1964, Stratigraphy and structure of the Antler Peak quadrangle, Humboldt and Lander Counties, Nevada.  USGS Professional Paper 459-A, 93 p.

 

Roberts, R.J., 2002, A passion for gold.  University of Nevada Press, 232 p.

 

Roberts, R.J., Hotz, P.E., Gilluly, J., and Ferguson, H.G., 1958, Paleozoic rocks of north-central Nevada.  AAPG Bulletin, v. 42(12), p. 2813-2857.

 

Rowell, A.J., Rees, M.N., and Suczek, C.A., 1977, Margin of the North American continent in Nevada during Late Cambrian time.  American Journal of Science, v. 279, p. 1-18.

 

Speed, R.C., and Sleep, N.H., 1982, Antler orogeny and foreland basin: A model.  GSA Bulletin, v. 93, p. 815-828.

 

Stahl, S.D., 1989, Recognition of Jurassic transport of rocks of the Roberts Mountains allochthon: Evidence from the Sonoma Range, north-central Nevada.  Geology, v. 17, p. 645-648.

 

Stewart, J.H., 1980, Geology of Nevada.  Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 4, 136 p.

 

Stewart, J.H., 1991, Latest Proterozoic and Cambrian rocks of the western United States—An overview, in Cooper, J.D., and Stevens, C.H., eds., Paleozoic Paleogeography of the western United States-II.  Pacific Section SEPM, v. 67, p. 13-38.

 

Suczek, C.A., 1977, Tectonic relations of the Harmony Formation, northern Nevada.  Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 96 p.

 

Suczek, C.A., 1981, Chert and orthoquartzite of the Valmy Formation: What is their depositional relationship?  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 13, no. 2, p. 109.

 

Theodore, T.G., 1991a, Preliminary geologic map of the North Peak quadrangle, Humboldt and Lander Counties, Nevada.  USGS open-file report 91-429.

 

Theodore, T.G., 1991b, Preliminary geologic map of the Valmy quadrangle, Humboldt County, Nevada.  USGS open-file report 91-430.

 

Theodore, T.G., 1994, Preliminary geologic map of the Snow Gulch quadrangle, Humboldt and Lander Counties, Nevada.  USGS open-file report 94-436.

 

Theodore, T.G., 2000, Geology of pluton-related gold mineralization at Battle Mountain, Nevada.  Monographs in mineral resource science no. 2, Center for mineral resources, Tucson, Arizona, 271 p.

 

Willden, R., 1964, Geology and mineral deposits of Humboldt County, Nevada.  Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 59, 154 p.

 

Zhou, X., and Rowland, S.M., 1993, Lower Cambrian bioherms in central Nevada and eastern California.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 25, no. 5, p. 169-170.

 

This document was last updated September 1, 2003.

 

Home

 

 

ABSTRACTS

 

1985

DEVONO-MISSISSIPPIAN SEDIMENTARY ENVIRONMENT AT THE TYPE ANTLER OROGEN AT BATTLE MOUNTAIN, NEVADA

            McCOLLUM, Linda B., BUCHANAN, John P., McCOLLUM, Michael B., Department of Geology, Eastern Washington Univ., Cheney, WA 99004

The Antler orogeny is a textbook example of a Paleozoic mountain building and crustal shortening event in western North America.  A relatively complex geologic history of the type Antler at Battle Mountain, Nevada, is interpreted as distinct thrust plates of Lower Cambrian Scott Canyon Formation, Upper Cambrian Harmony Sandstone, and Ordovician Valmy Formation, overlain unconformably by the Middle Pennsylvanian Battle Formation.  Mississippian crustal deformation and emplacement of the Roberts Mountain thrust have previously been thought to characterize the Antler orogen.

            Detailed sedimentology studies of the Scott Canyon and Harmony, and the relationship with the overlying Battle Formation at the type section of the Antler orogeny, cast doubt on the previously accepted geologic history.  The Scott Canyon is an interbedded sequence of pillow basalts, Late Devonian radiolarian cherts, and mudstone debris flows with numerous limestone olistoliths, many containing undescribed archaeocyathid fauna.  The Scott Canyon and overlying Harmony are interbedded and in depositional contact.

            The contact of the Harmony with the Battle Formation appears channeled, but otherwise conformable, and the Battle has been interpreted as an alluvial fan facies.  The paleoenvironmental interpretation of these sediments in that the Scott Canyon was deposited upon a Late Devonian active continental margin setting, with prograding fan deposits of the Harmony Sandstone, overlain by Middle Pennsylvanian fanglomerates of the Battle Formation.  This conformable sequence appears to preclude any major uplift with the type Antler orogen.

 

1987

THE SCOTT CANYON FORMATION, BATTLE MOUNTAIN, NEVADA:  A STRUCTURAL AMALGAMATION OF THE ORDOVICIAN VALMY FORMATION AND DEVONIAN SLAVEN CHERT

            McCOLLUM, Linda B., McCOLLUM, Michael B., Geology Dept., Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA 99004;  JONES, David L., Department of Geology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;  REPETSKI, John E., U.S. Geological Survey, E-501 U.S. National Museum, Washington, DC 20560

A reevaluation of the type areas for several formations within the Roberts Mountains allochthon (RMA) in the Antler orogen is presently under way.  The oldest formation within the RMA was believed to be the Scott Canyon Formation, which contained a late Early Cambrian archaeocyathid fauna.  Devonian radiolaria were reported by Jones and others in 1978 from bedded cherts at the type section, suggesting regional equivalency to the Devonian Slaven Chert.

            McCollum, Buchanan, and McCollum, in 1985, noted that the Cambrian faunas reported from the Scott Canyon and Harmony Formations occurred in limestone olistoliths within debris flows.  Therefore, the only reliable age determination was the Devonian microfauna within the Scott Canyon, and the overlying Harmony was tacitly assumed to be as young as Early Mississippian.

            Geologic mapping at a scale of 1:4,800 revealed that part of the type section of the Scott Canyon Formation is a down dropped block of Slaven Chert within the Butte Mine fault system.  The remaining Scott Canyon Formation contains a Middle to Late Ordovician microfauna, and is herein assigned to the Valmy Formation.  The overlying Harmony now appears to be equivalent to the Silurian Elder Sandstone.

 

1989

THE ANTLER OROGENY:  A TRANSPRESSIONAL OROGEN WITHIN A TRANSCURRENT FAULT SYSTEM

McCOLLUM, Linda B., McCOLLUM, Michael B., Department of Geology, Easter Washington University, Cheney, WA 99004

The Eden Valley terrane, exposed in the Osgood Mountains and Hot Springs Range, consists of a Mississippian to Permian continental slope to ocean basin sequence adjacent to the Antler orogen.  The sequence is composed of quartz-rich submarine sand sheets containing chert granules, radiolarian and spicular ribbon cherts, and submarine pillow basalts of the Lower Mississippian Farrel Canyon Formation; submarine basalts, chert pebble conglomerates, and carbonate debris flows of the Upper Mississippian to Lower Pennsylvanian Goughs Canyon Formation; mud-supported olistostromes with boulders derived from the Cambrian Preble Formation (autochthon), the Silurian Elder/Harmony Sandstone (allochthon), and Upper Mississippian bioclastic limestone in the Middle to Upper Pennsylvanian “Getchell” (formerly mapped as Harmony by Hotz and Willden, 1964) formation.  The Eden Valley terrane is separated from the autochthon by a high-angle transcurrent fault, and sealed by the Lower Permian Adam Peak Formation.  Mesozoic thrust faulting subsequently detached this amalgamated terrane and moved it cratonward several kilometers.

            The Eden Valley terrane places severe constraints on the tectonics of the Antler orogeny.  Petrology and geochemistry of the submarine basalts show that they lack olivine, and rare earth elements place them in a “within-plate” tectonic regime.  This effectively excludes all island arc and rift models thus far proposed for the Antler orogen.  In addition, the rather limited geographic extent of the Antler highland and foreland basins, the presence of the highly folded and subsequently detached oceanic rocks of the Roberts Mountains allochthon and the lack of Carboniferous plutonism and volcanism all support a transpressional origin for the Antler orogeny.  This orogen appears to be part of a Carboniferous left-lateral transcurrent fault system which extended southward from the Beaufort Sea (Eisbacher, 1983).  A minimum displacement of 2500 km is needed to account for an endemic Siberian archaeocyathid fauna found in limestone olistoliths with the Valmy Formation (formerly mapped as Scott Canyon by Roberts, 1964) at Battle Mountain with the nearest similar fauna in the Mackenzie Mountains of northwest Canada.

 

1991

THE ADAM PEAK ALLOCHTHON:  A COMPOSITE TERRANE IN THE OSGOOD MOUNTAINS AND HOT SPRINGS RANGE, NORTHER NEVADA

McCOLLUM, Linda B., McCOLLUM, Michael B., Department of Geology, Easter Washington University, Cheney, WA 99004

In the Osgood Mountains, the Adam Peak allochthon is a composite terrane composed of the lower Paleozoic Osgood terrane of Madden-McGuire and Marsh (1991), unconformably overlain by the upper Paleozoic Antler overlap sequence, and the upper Paleozoic Eden Valley terrane of McCollum and McCollum (1989, 1991).  The Eden Valley and Osgood terranes are separated along the Osgood Mountain suture, a high-angle, north-south structure which predates the Adam Peak thrust.  Recently completed geologic mapping in the Adam Peak and Eden Valley 7.5-minute quadrangles includes much of the aerial extent of the Adam Peak allochthon in the Osgood Mountains.

            In the Hot Springs Range, the upper Paleozoic and Triassic rocks are part of a folded sequence of allochthons whose basal, undeformed decollement rests upon the lower Paleozoic Harmony Formation of the Roberts Mountains terrane.  Although the Osgood terrane is not present in the Hot Springs Range, this low-angle decollement appears to be correlative with the Adam Peak thrust.  As pointed out by Sosson and other (1984), deformation within the allochthon is post-Upper Triassic, and therefore not related to the Golconda allochthon and deformation during the Sonoma orogeny, as recently proposed by Jones and Jones (1991).  However, the Golconda allochthon may be represented by Upper Mississippian to Lower Pennsylvanian lithic quartz sandstones, previously referred to the Havallah sequence in the Hot Springs Range, and erroneously included in the Farrel Canyon Formation by Hotz and Willden (1964) in the Osgood Mountains.

 

Last updated 2/04